Intelligence (13)

Articles with relevance to philosophy, science, politics, religion and other manifestations of human ideas.

Children categories


Philosophy (9)

Resources on the range of human thought that has been expressed in response to the enigma of existence through the ages.
View items...

Politics (1)

Resources relating to systems of order in society and their ramifications.
View items...

Science (3)

Gadgets, technological and scientific developments, ideas and hypotheses.
View items...
Saturday, 21 March 2009 15:55

Something very strange...

Written by

In this age of global satellites and google Earth under the sea, it can seem that there is little left unknown in the world.

And that is where Bloop comes in.

From Wikipedia: 'Bloop is an ultra-low frequency underwater sound detected by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration several times during the summer of 1997. The source of the sound remains unknown.'

Basically, the form of the sound is consistent with that of a living animal, but it would have to be much larger than the largest animal known (also the largest animal ever known to have existed on Earth), the Blue Whale, in order to generate such a sound.

You can listen to the sound here at (2.5 MB version)

Friday, 05 September 2008 17:16

Large hadron collider

Written by

On September the 10 2008, the switch was thrown and the great machine whirred into life, on October 21 the first high energy collision is scheduled - protons will dash around a circuit, to collide at a speed a fraction below the speed of light. And the collision will cause the particles to resemble the state of matter a billionth of a second after the birth of the universe. neon bars

Some people believe that this will cause the end of the world.  Just as some people have always believed many things have heralded the end of the world. Eclipses, arbitrary calendar dates, asteroids and giant space crabs (probably).  When faced with the new, or unknown, people have made all sorts of predictions,  Dr Dionysius Larder said in the 19th century 'rail travel at high speed is not possible because passengers, unable to breathe, would die of asphyxia', for instance.  Here is a list of other erroneous predictions.

Of course, the untested nature of this experiment means there is a wild card chance that the naysayers will be proved correct.

Professor Otto Rössler is one notable doomsayer among a handful of worried scientists mounting a last minute challenge to the experiment.  He believes that particles colliding at such speeds will create miniature black holes that will slowly munch away at the fabric of the universe.

This site: / is entirely devoted to the pessimism of the doomsayers. but this is the official site of the large hadron collider: where an enthusiastic optimism reigns.  They hope to understand why particles that make up matter have mass, while the particles that make up light don't appear to have any mass at all.  The elusive Higgs boson is a theoretical particle that has been postulated to make sense of this.  Perhaps it will show up, at long last, when the collider smashes it into being.

When it comes down to it, we are being bombarded continually by cosmic radiation - particles are shooting through you as you read this - including neutrinos and radioactive cosmic rays.  The universe is far stranger that any experiment we can perform.  The LHC is a grand monument to human endeavour,  raise a toast to human inquisitivity - it might be your last!

Tuesday, 30 September 2008 19:06


Written by


I recently saw this excellent and thought provoking film.  Dr James Orbinski relates his experience in the midst of diabolical human conflicts, attempting to save lives through his work as a Doctor with, and President of the international council of, Médecins Sans Frontières.


There is much to take away from his experience.   A soft spoken, measured man, he talks of having a near 'uncontainable rage' over the circumstances he has witnessed.  And the merest glimpse that this film can allow the viewer shows the reason for this.  He returns to Rwanda, and to Somalia, to revist the countries in which grotesque political situations have led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people.
He has been amongst the worst of what humans can do, he has stood in the midst of murder, greed, rape, genocide, and attempted to ease the suffering.
Thursday, 16 July 2009 22:13

Paradox 2 - the set that cannot contain itself

Written by

locksThe set of all sets that do not contain themselves as members cannot contain itself, therefore it both does and doesn't contain itself.

Or to put it more simply:

A popularised version of Bertrand Russell's paradox is to imagine a place where there is a male Barber.  He shaves all the men who do not shave themselves.

Does he shave himself?

He cannot, because he can only shave those who do not shave themselves.  If he does not, then he does not shave himself and therefore is part of the set of those who do not shave themselves, and he must shave himself...

Wittgenstein claimed to have solved this paradox (Russell's theory of types) in his 'Tractatus'.  Essentially he claimed it showed a problem with using language to describe the world and used logical symbols to refute it.  You can read more on this here, at project Euclid

Saturday, 16 May 2009 09:59

Paradox 1 - Buddhism, desiring to end desire

Written by

ornate doorSiddharta Gautama, the Buddha, taught that all existence is suffering, and that all suffering is predominantly caused by want - or desire. In order to be free of suffering, we must rid ourselves of wanting.

The precepts seem quite sensible, but there is a paradox here.

We are told that we must end suffering by ending wanting.

But wanting to end suffering is in itself a further want.

So, by wanting to decrease our suffering we are actually increasing it.

John Visvader refers to this as an uroboric (like a snake swallowing its own tail) philosophy.

Wayne Alt argues that there is no paradox

Al Herman replies to Wayne Alt

Monday, 27 April 2009 21:27

Moral dilemma 6 - Nirvana vs extinction

Written by

red lanterns in china town

Today a though struck me, which I suppose could be posited as a moral dilemma.

It came to me, ironically perhaps, as I was meditating:

Would a true Buddhist save an animal species from extinction, if they were the only one who could, given the Buddhist belief in Nirvana (the end of the cycle of birth, death and rebirth) as the ultimate attainment and goal of being?

A Buddhist should also believe in the application of right thought and of right action.  Is it right to let an animal species die out when it could be prevented?

Thursday, 22 January 2009 10:34

Big questions

Written by

Epicurus was an interesting ancient Greek philosopher, I find a lot of his conclusions quite sensible and moderate - that death is the end and not to be feared, that a life of moderate pleasure and doing no harm should be one's goal.

But, aside from his sensible and quite scientific ideas, he is well known for stating the following challenge to theistic arguments:

The Problem of Evil

"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is impotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil?"

Now, some philosophers state that what we consider to be evil is the product of free will.  God created the universe and man to have the greatest good, and part of that good was the ability to choose to be good or to be evil, free will.

However, while this might explain moral evils, such as genocide or murder, where human beings choose to do evil, it does not explain natural evil.  Say a baby born to die of leukaemia, or a faun caught in a forest fire, caused to die in prolonged agony by its injuries. (see this PDF of 'The problem of evil and some varieties of atheism, by William L Rowe')

Sunday, 02 November 2008 16:16

Moral dilemma 5 - doctor

Written by

Imagine that you are a Doctor.

You have five patients, each of whom has a terminal illness, each in a different major organ of the body.  Without transplants from suitable donors they will certainly die.

Now, another patient comes in for a routine check up and in the course of this you discover that they are a perfect match for each of the five other patients respectively, and that by taking their organs and transplanting them, you will have a 100 per cent certainty of saving those five people.  The one donor patient will die.

What should you do?

Tuesday, 16 September 2008 07:54

Moral dilemma 4 - collision course

Written by

On September 10 2008, the large hadron collider was finally switched on.  It is a machine that is at the cusp of human knowledge and endeavour, it will enable humanity to understand the universe and provide knowledge of benefit to all people, living and of the future.

However, tragically, a person was killed in the construction of the machine.

The dilemma is this.  If you were the chief engineer of the project, and you were told in advance of starting construction that it was a certainty that one person would be killed, would you still continue with the project?

How about if the chance of one person dying was 75%?

or 50%?

Or unknowable?

Contact me

You can This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
connect on Facebook
or Linkedin
or twitter/michaelfredman